France’s e-invoicing reform requires businesses to adopt structured digital invoice formats, Factur-X, UBL, or EDIFACT by 2026. These formats enable automation, interoperability, and compliance with EU standard EN 16931, replacing manual, error-prone paper or PDF invoices.
Key Takeaways
- E-invoicing ensures machine-readable invoices that cut errors, speed payments, and support real-time VAT reporting.
- France recognizes three main syntaxes: Factur-X (PDF + XML hybrid), UBL (XML standard), and EDIFACT (EDI legacy format).
- Factur-X is best for SMEs and domestic use, balancing human readability with automation.
- UBL is highly interoperable and ideal for multinational, cross-border invoicing, especially within Peppol networks.
- EDIFACT remains useful in large enterprises with legacy EDI systems but is less future-oriented.
- Compliance requires using certified platforms (PDPs/PPF) for secure invoice creation, validation, and exchange.
E-invoicing is the creation, exchange, and archiving of invoices as structured digital data, so finance systems can read them automatically—no typing, scanning, or OCR. Unlike “traditional” invoicing (paper or basic PDFs sent by email), e-invoices follow agreed data standards and travel through trusted networks or certified platforms. That shift delivers fewer errors, faster processing and payment, and real-time tax visibility.
Common e-invoice formats
At the heart of e-invoicing is data structure, whether invoice information is encoded so machines can understand it instantly, or presented mainly for people to read.
Structured data eliminates re-keying and OCR, reduces errors, speeds up approvals, and enables real-time VAT controls. Unstructured documents look fine to humans but require manual work or scanning, which is slow and error-prone.
Aspect | Structured (e-invoice XML: UBL/CII/Factur-X XML) | Unstructured (paper or simple PDF) |
Readability | Machine-readable; can be rendered for humans | Human-readable only; machines can’t reliably parse |
Data capture | Automatic (no OCR/manual typing) | Manual entry or OCR (error-prone) |
Validation | Built-in checks (totals, VAT IDs, formats) | Limited; errors found after the fact |
Speed | Straight-through processing and matching | Slower approvals and posting |
Compliance | Supports mandated fields and real-time reporting | Lacks mandated structure; non-compliant for B2B under FR reform |
Interoperability | Standard schemas enable platform-to-platform exchange | Layout varies by sender; poor interoperability |
Archiving | Metadata preserved for 10-year retention and audit | Visual only; weak metada |
France accepts three core syntaxes for B2B e-invoicing: UBL 2.1, UN/CEFACT CII, and Factur-X (a PDF/A-3 file with embedded XML). All three carry the same EU-standard invoice semantics (EN 16931), so the choice is mostly about packaging and interoperability.
UBL is an open international standard developed by OASIS for structured electronic documents, including invoices. In France, UBL 2.1 is accepted as a compliant e-invoicing format under EN 16931. Its strength lies in flexibility and interoperability, enabling seamless exchange of invoices across industries and borders. UBL is widely adopted in Europe, making it suitable for organisations with multinational operations.
EDIFACT (Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport) is a long-standing UN/CEFACT standard for electronic data exchange. In the context of e-invoicing in France, EDIFACT remains relevant for large organisations with established EDI systems. While less user-friendly compared to hybrid formats like Factur-X, EDIFACT offers a robust framework for automated, high-volume invoice exchange across global supply chains.
Factur-X is France’s hybrid e-invoicing format that combines a human-readable PDF with an embedded XML file. The PDF ensures accessibility for users, while the XML provides structured data that meets the European Standard EN 16931. This dual approach supports both manual handling and automated processing, making Factur-X highly practical for businesses of all sizes. It is recognised by French authorities and widely used for compliance with Chorus Pro.
PDF/A-3 is an archival PDF standard that allows embedding files (like XML) inside the PDF. In Factur-X, that means one file serves both as the official human-readable invoice and the machine-readable data source simplifying distribution and long-term storage.
Criteria | Factur-X (PDF + XML) | UBL (XML) | EDIFACT (EDI) |
Human-readability | Yes, the invoice is a PDF file for easy viewing. | No, requires software to render a human view. | No, not directly human-readable (structured text codes). |
Machine-readability | Yes, embedded XML (EN 16931 compliant) enables automation. | Yes, XML structure aligned with EN 16931, widely interoperable. | Yes, structured EDI segments, suited for automated EDI systems. |
Mandate compliance | Accepted by French PPF/PDP as a core format, fully EN 16931 compliant. | Accepted by PPF/PDP as a core format, fully compliant with EN 16931. | Not a core format. Supported only via PDP conversion; indirectly compliant. |
Use cases/adoption | Best for domestic invoicing with a readable copy. Ideal for SMEs. Promoted in France and Germany. Supported by Chorus Pro. | Best for cross-border trade and large B2B networks. Widely used across the EU and Peppol. | Common in large enterprises with legacy EDI, especially in supply chains. Maintained mainly where already in use. |
Interoperability | Good, convertible with UBL and other formats; PDPs handle it. Peppol less native. | Excellent, international standard, widely used in Peppol and EU systems. | Limited, depends on EDI communities. Not supported in Peppol; requires mapping. |
Human processing needs | Yes, PDF allows easy viewing/printing, useful for audits and non-automated users. | Needs a viewer or conversion for human use; mainly system-handled. | Not readable; requires translation in EDI systems. |
Technical complexity | Moderate, needs PDF/A-3 with XML. Supported by most invoicing software in France. | Moderate, straightforward XML; many libraries/templates available. | High, requires EDI expertise, specialised software, and bilateral agreements. |
Extensibility | Supports additional fields via the Extended profile, but limited flexibility beyond standard. | Very flexible, extensions and CIUS allow country-specific adjustments. | Limited, rigid message structures; extensions are cumbersome. |
Recommended use in 2025 | Strongly recommended for domestic invoicing in France. Fully compliant, easy for SMEs, and ZUGFeRD-compatible for Germany. | Recommended for multinational operations and Peppol integration. Suitable for firms preferring one global XML standard. | Only recommended if legacy EDI is already in use. Not preferred for new implementations due to limited future relevance. |
Format | Pros | Cons |
Factur-X (PDF + XML hybrid) | Human-readable PDF with embedded XML. Fully EN 16931 compliant. Easy for SMEs, supported by local software. Compatible with ZUGFeRD. | Larger file size. Limited use in Peppol. Less flexible than UBL. |
UBL (Universal Business Language) | Widely adopted in the EU and Peppol. EN 16931 compliant. Flexible with extensions. Ideal for cross-border trade. | Not human-readable. Requires software or integration. Customisation can add complexity. |
EDIFACT (EDI standard) | Long-established in global supply chains. Strong automation for large enterprises. Efficient for high volumes. | Not a core format in France. Complex and costly. Not human-readable. Limited future relevance. |
Creating a compliant e-invoice in France may sound complex, but it’s simply about using the right format and the right certified platform. Here’s how you can do it step by step:
E-invoicing formats in France, Factur-X, UBL, and EDIFACT, are designed to meet different business needs. Factur-X, with its PDF XML hybrid structure, is practical for SMEs and local compliance. UBL is widely adopted in cross-border transactions, offering flexibility and interoperability. EDIFACT, though older, remains a staple for large corporations with established legacy systems.
I’m a Senior Content Writer at ClearTax, specializing in e-invoicing, VAT, and Tax compliance. Over the years, I’ve researched and written everything from blog posts to whitepapers and product guides, helping ClearTax expand in Malaysia, KSA, UAE, Singapore, Belgium, France and beyond. My goal is to write the most comprehensive, understandable, readable, and accurate content on any topic that has ever existed on the internet. Read more